Username / E-Mail Address
Stay logged in
Search for posts, etc
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
But, I assume that's not going to happen - so my advice is you purge away the 20 worst players - I need say no names - we all know who im talking about - players who are more likely to decide the outcome of games than the best players.
Im satisfied about the level 2 games, sometimes there are ruiners (removed), but its the rare case.
Alas, if i could play in SL2/3.SL1 Starts to suck hard as more and more noobs flood it, and i am quite stuck there, because of my awesome luck with good teams, and if reset stats i will be permamently stuck in SL0.+1 souwleye...
I hope you don't take this offensively, but "if i reset my stats i will be permanently stuck in SL0." -> if that is the case, you really do not deserve to be in sl2 or sl3. Most SL2 or SL3 players get 60-90% winrate if they play sl0 games (just something i've found out via empiric observation)PS: The SL1 requirements could be increased abit. (say, (20+ games 40%+ winrate) or (10+ games and 50%+ winrate) )
I am unlucky with team
everyone with win% below 50 says that... so where are the bad guys?
since we are talking about sl2 i expect from u or everyone who plays there, to be able to carry a game himself, having knowledge of competitive lineups and can react on game situations. Ofc everybody can have a bad game and everybody has, but its a difference between having a bad game and not being able to do better.
Page created in 0.292 seconds with 34 queries.